TrialsNest
Sign Up
Sponsor-safe recruiting visibility

See what changed—and who owns the next action.

Follow aggregate movement across studies, sites, sources, blocker categories, and close reasons without entering patient-level recruiting workspaces.

TrialsNest sponsor dashboard showing the current sponsor workspace, portfolio metrics, reporting cards, and right rail.
TrialsNest sponsor dashboard showing the current sponsor workspace, portfolio metrics, reporting cards, and right rail.
Sponsor Pulse preview

A weekly update should explain what changed.

Sponsors need more than a lead count. The reporting view should connect movement to an operating pattern, owner, and decision.

PortfolioSitesSourcesBlockers
Portfolio view

Where is recruiting movement changing?

Current signalMovement slowed at one study
Primary patternSite review backlog
Next decisionConfirm site operating plan
Sites view

Which site needs operating support?

Site groupOne site needs attention
Blocker categoryCoordinator coverage
OwnerSite operations lead
Sources view

Is volume turning into useful movement?

Source trendInterest increased
Review movementStable
QuestionClarify source quality
Blockers view

What is repeatedly slowing the funnel?

Common categoryFollow-up delay
Affected areaTwo recruiting queues
Next actionReview response coverage
Proof behind the update

Make every sponsor signal traceable to an operating question.

The useful proof is not a large headline number. It is a consistent record of movement, blocker category, owner, and decision across the reporting cadence.

Example only
Portfolio movement

A change is tied to the study and reporting period.

The update identifies where movement changed and separates a current operating pattern from normal variation.

  • Reporting window is clear
  • Affected study is identified
  • Change excludes patient details
Example only
Site support

A blocker becomes a site-owned operating plan.

The sponsor sees the blocker category and responsible operating team while the site retains its private recruiting workspace.

  • Blocker category is documented
  • Next owner is named
  • Follow-up decision has a due point
Example only
Source quality

Volume is considered alongside review movement.

The reporting conversation connects source activity to useful workflow movement instead of treating lead volume as the outcome.

  • Source trend is visible
  • Review movement is compared
  • Next evaluation question is recorded

These fictional examples illustrate workflow evidence and are not customer testimonials, performance results, or enrollment claims.

Follow the aggregate signal

See the sponsor signal and the site-level operating handoff.

Switch perspectives to see how an aggregate blocker becomes a site-owned next action. The sponsor view never exposes patient details.

Choose a perspective
Stage 01Patient interest
01 - Patient interest

See source activity as an aggregate signal.

The sponsor view begins with study- and site-level inquiry movement, not patient identity or submitted answers.

Current signal
New study inquiry
Owner
Intake queue
Blocking condition
Contact preference not confirmed
Next action
Review the submitted study interest
Fictional aggregate example
Fictional example
Source trend
Inquiry volume increased
Site movement
3 sites receiving interest
Patient details
Not shown
What the next role receives

A structured inquiry enters the coordinator queue.

Stage 02Guided prescreen
02 - Guided prescreen

See prescreen movement, not the answers themselves.

Sponsors can understand aggregate completion and review movement without seeing patient-level prescreen responses.

Current signal
Prescreen submitted
Owner
Coordinator review
Blocking condition
One answer needs clarification
Next action
Review answers against the study workflow
Fictional aggregate example
Fictional example
Completion trend
Stable this week
Review backlog
One site needs attention
Prescreen answers
Not shown
What the next role receives

The study team receives organized answers for review.

Stage 03Site review
03 - Site review

See where site review is slowing movement.

Sponsor reporting can identify aggregate review delays and decision needs without exposing coordinator notes or patient records.

Current signal
Review in progress
Owner
Assigned coordinator
Blocking condition
Study-team question remains open
Next action
Confirm whether outreach should continue
Fictional aggregate example
Fictional example
Review movement
Slower at one site
Decision needed
Site workflow follow-up
Coordinator notes
Not shown
What the next role receives

The reviewed inquiry moves to follow-up, records, or a documented close reason.

Stage 04Records and readiness
04 - Records and readiness

See readiness categories without seeing record contents.

Sponsors can see aggregate readiness blockers and site-level trends, while document contents remain outside the sponsor view.

Current signal
Readiness check open
Owner
Site operations
Blocking condition
Requested item is still pending
Next action
Follow up on the outstanding request
Fictional aggregate example
Fictional example
Primary blocker
Readiness follow-up
Affected sites
2 sites
Record contents
Not shown
What the next role receives

The site can see whether the inquiry is ready to move toward scheduling.

Stage 05Visit scheduling
05 - Visit scheduling

See scheduled movement as an aggregate operating signal.

The sponsor view shows site-level scheduling movement and delay categories, not individual appointments or contact details.

Current signal
Ready for scheduling outreach
Owner
Coordinator
Blocking condition
Availability not confirmed
Next action
Offer the next appropriate scheduling step
Fictional aggregate example
Fictional example
Scheduled movement
Improved this week
Delay category
Availability confirmation
Appointment details
Not shown
What the next role receives

The patient and site receive a clear scheduling status.

Stage 06Outcome and update
06 - Outcome and update

Receive a decision-ready update without patient-level access.

Sponsor Pulse can summarize movement, source quality, site blockers, close-reason trends, owners, and next actions at an aggregate level.

Current signal
Weekly movement summarized
Owner
Site leadership
Blocking condition
One decision needs follow-up
Next action
Confirm the owner and due date
Fictional Sponsor Pulse example
Fictional example
Movement
Scheduling increased
Primary risk
Readiness backlog at one site
Next decision
Confirm recovery owner
What the next role receives

Sponsors receive aggregate movement, blockers, and next actions.

Outcome-focused oversight

Turn reporting into an operating conversation.

These are workflow outcomes—not unsupported performance claims.

Spot stalled sites sooner

Separate site-level operating delay from normal recruiting variation.

Read beyond lead volume

Connect source activity to review movement, blockers, and documented outcomes.

Name the next owner

Pair the operating signal with the team responsible for the next action.

Prepare clearer updates

Package movement, close reasons, and decisions into a sponsor-safe summary.

Sponsor-safe by design

Operational visibility without patient-level workspace access.

Sponsor reporting is designed around aggregate study, site, source, movement, blocker, and next-action signals. Private patient information and research-team work remain outside the sponsor view.

Sponsors can see

  • Aggregate portfolio and study movement
  • Site-level operating patterns
  • Source trends and blocker categories
  • Documented next-action ownership

Sponsors cannot see

  • Patient identity or contact information
  • Private prescreen answers or records
  • Coordinator notes or message contents
  • Patient-level eligibility decisions
Bring your operating questions

See how TrialsNest would surface movement, blockers, and next actions across your portfolio.

Book a focused sponsor workflow demo built around the studies, sites, and reporting cadence your team manages today.